March 24, 2026
Given A=\{a^ib^jc^k \mid i=j+k\}, B=\{a^ib^jc^k \mid j=i+k\}, C=\{a^ib^jc^k \mid k=i+j\}, and \small G_1: \begin{cases} S \longrightarrow S_1 S_2 \\ S_1 \longrightarrow aS_1b \mid \lambda \\ S_2 \longrightarrow bS_2c \mid \lambda \end{cases} \quad G_2: \begin{cases} S \longrightarrow aSc \mid S' \\ S' \longrightarrow bS'c \mid \lambda \\ \end{cases} \quad G_3: \begin{cases} S \longrightarrow aSc \mid S' \\ S' \longrightarrow aS'b \mid \lambda \\ \end{cases} Which of the following options is correct?
Given the following grammars: \small G_1: \begin{cases} S \longrightarrow A B\\ A \longrightarrow Aaa \mid a \mid \lambda\\ B \longrightarrow Baa \mid aa \mid \lambda \end{cases} \quad G_2: \begin{cases} S \longrightarrow A \mid B \mid \lambda \\ A \longrightarrow Aaa \mid a \\ B \longrightarrow Baa \mid aa \end{cases}
Consider the following grammar with 5 productions: \small \begin{array}{rl} S &\rightarrow A\,B \\ A &\rightarrow a\,A \mid \lambda \\ B &\rightarrow b\,B \mid \lambda\end{array}.
How many productions has the grammars obtained by depurating it?
There is no need to define a new initial symbol, but you need to remove \lambda-productions and unary productions.
We want to show that L= \{a^mb^nc^md^n \mid m,n \geq 0\} is not context-free using directly the pumping lemma for CFL. Given the pumping length N, we choose a word w to apply the lemma.
Which of the following choices has some hope to make the rest of the argument correct?
Theorem 1 If L is a CFL and L' is regular, then L\cap L' is a CFL, i.e. CFL are closed under intersection with regular languages.
Proof sketch 1: via PDAs and the cross product construction
Proof sketch 2: G=(V,\Sigma,\mathcal R,S) grammar in Chomsky Normal Form that does not generate \lambda, M=(Q,\Sigma,\delta,q_0,\{q_F\}) a DFA with a single final state. The grammar for \mathscr{L}(G)\cap \mathscr{L}(M) is G'=(V',\Sigma,\mathcal R',S'), where \begin{align*} V'=&\{\langle q,A,r\rangle \mid q,r\in Q,A\in V\} \\ S'=&\langle q_0,S,q_F\rangle \\ \mathcal R' = &\{\langle q,A,r\rangle \to t \mid A\to t \in \mathcal R \text{ with } t\in \Sigma\cup\{\lambda\} \land \delta(q,t)=r \} \cup\\ &\{\langle q,A,r\rangle \to \langle q,B,s\rangle\langle s,B,r\rangle \mid A\to BC \in \mathcal R \land q,s,r\in Q \} \end{align*}
\langle q,A,r\rangle generates the strings w that are generated by A in G such that when M reads w starting from state q, it ends in state r.